Fishbowls of Influence
Love Music More · hosted by Luke F. Walton · Solo episode
Listen
Topics discussed
Host note
Do good chords exist? Bad ones? If they did, how would anyone know? I take the case of the Tsimane', an Indigenous people in the Bolivian Amazon, and what their listening does to a Western idea of which chords are naturally pleasant.
The comparison is the one music theory treats as settled: consonant against dissonant, the intervals a Western ear is taught to hear as pretty or tense. Headphones go in. The result I care about is a different psychoacoustic response, not a confirmation of the textbook ranking. Preference can be a growing habit inside a tradition. A bunch of neat ratios does not settle it. The Tsimane' are not a time capsule, and not a control group to talk over. Their songs carry stories. Communities in this work are reachable by canoe. The lesson is that "pleasant" is something a culture trains, not something a chord possesses.
I call the surrounding condition a fishbowl. You do not notice the water. Western ears swim in a harmony pedagogy, a recording tradition, a set of intervals heard so often they feel like physics. Step outside it, or listen to someone who did not grow up inside it, and the clean idea of a universally pretty chord gets harder to defend. The music of the spheres is a beautiful metaphor. It is a bad description of what a chord does to a person.
The week after this, on What Babies Listen To, I ask the question from the other direction: what a two-day-old brain already does with a phrase. Consonance is the piece I still will not call innate.
Selected moments
- Good chords, bad chords I open on whether those categories exist, and on how anyone would know.
- The Tsimane' case I use listening among the Tsimane', in the Bolivian Amazon, against a Western ranking of pleasant chords.
- Headphones, not a time capsule I keep the method in view, and I refuse to treat the Tsimane' as a frozen control group. The songs carry stories.
- Ratios are not the verdict I set the textbook intervals next to a different psychoacoustic response. A neat ratio does not decide what a person hears as pretty.
- The fishbowl I name the condition: Western ears swim in a harmony tradition so familiar it feels like physics.
- Music of the spheres I keep the metaphor and drop it as a description. A chord does not come with a universal pleasantness attached.
- The week after I point ahead to the newborn episode, where the same question shows up before culture has had years to train the ear.
FAQ
Do good chords and bad chords exist?
Not as a law of nature, on the argument I make here. Western theory ranks some intervals as consonant and some as dissonant, and a Western ear often agrees. Listening among the Tsimane' of the Bolivian Amazon does not simply confirm that ranking. Pleasantness looks trained.
Who are the Tsimane' in this episode?
An Indigenous people in the Bolivian Amazon. I use research that brought headphones to communities reachable by canoe, and I try not to turn them into a time capsule. Their songs carry stories. The point is what their listening does to the idea that a chord is naturally pleasant.
What is the fishbowl?
The culture you cannot see because you are in it. Harmony pedagogy, recordings, the intervals heard so often they feel like physics. The episode is about noticing that water. The following week, What Babies Listen To, asks what is already there before those years of training.
These pages are host notes, not a full transcript. An automatic transcript is on the Spotify episode.